新东方解析2010年9.12阅读简答1-3

2010-09-13 00:00:00来源:网络

  凌凌教你学口语:每日一句系列
  备战口译:原创双语时事汇总

  新东方解析2010年9.12阅读简答1-3

  2010秋9.12口译考试题目与解析,新东方第一时间放送——

  1-3

  In the latest round of credit-card reforms, issuers and retailers are both playing the consumer-friendly angle. Currently lawmakers are debating whether to cut interchange fees, the tab that merchants pay to card issuers each time a customer uses plastic. While retailers claim they would pass the savings on to shoppers in the form of lower prices, card companies argue the legislation will make credit less convenient and more costly—and they may be right.

  首段主要讲目前的法律有可能会使信用卡变得不方便,还会提高使用成本。大家仍然要把握阅读时的要点:即先找文章铺垫结束,主题开始的地方。在本文中即首段结尾句。本文的重点在于less convenient and more costly. 针对本段的第一题问首句的意思和interchange fee的定义。定位很简单,分别是本段的其他句子和第三行的同位语结构:the tab that …

  Merchants have long complained about interchange fees. They say the costs, which amount to roughly 1.6% of every transaction, erode already razor-thin margins. Last year retailers, the main supporters of three bills now working their way through Congress, forked over an estimated $48 billion in card fees. "We can't keep absorbing these fees," Kathy Miller, a grocery store owner in Elmore, Vt., testified at a congressional hearing in early October.

  In their quest to win over lawmakers, retailers maintain consumers won't get hurt—and may actually benefit. "Our market is extraordinarily competitive," says Mallory B. Duncan, general counsel of the National Retail Federation, a trade group. "If costs go down, that tends to drive down prices."

  这两段是非常常见的论述-例证段落。显然与上文more costly 相对应。因为这两段没有考点,所以可以只读两个statements,做一个简要处理。

  That's not what happened in Australia, though. In 2003 the country's regulators cut the average interchange fee to around 0.5% of the total bill, from 1%. But most retailers never dropped their prices, and credit-card issuers jacked up borrowers' fees to make up for the lost revenue, according to a report by CRA International, a consultancy. After the regulation was passed, the annual fee paid by cardholders rose by 22%, to an average of $25.65. Annual fees on rewards cards jumped by as much as 77% since issuers' profits took a bigger hit. Australian card companies generally levied a higher interchange fee on rewards cards to cover the added cost of the perks—as they do in the U.S.

  下面一段讲澳大利亚的retailers并没有信守他们的诺言,在国家削减信用卡交易费用之后,没有相应的降低价格。然后是较长的例证部分。针对本段的问题是:澳大利亚的具体情形是怎样的?为什么要举这个例子?答案在本段的例证中,考生可对其进行总结。

  Analysts worry that retailers and card issuers in the States would respond in much the same way. Already U.S. lenders have been raising rates and tacking on new charges for borrowers following a ban earlier this year from Congress on certain practices, including late-payment penalties."When the banks have a major source of revenue eliminated, they need to raise [other fees] to make up for that," says David S. Evans, a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School.

  Any new rules could make it less convenient for consumers to opt for credit over cash. As part of the proposals, lawmakers are considering whether to let retailers set a minimum payment for purchases with plastic; they now risk paying a hefty fine for doing so. If such changes are made, customers won't be able to pull out their cards all the time. Merchants may also have the option of rejecting a specific card, like a reward card, if they think the interchange fees are too high. Currently retailers must accept all products under a single brand such as Visa. "Consumers want to be able to use their card for any kind of purchase," says Shawn Miles, MasterCard Worldwide's (MA) head of global public policy. The legislation is "anti-consumer."

  新的立法很有可能会加大消费者使用信用卡的难度。最后一题即是针对本段的。答题者需要将本段的2个要点写清楚,即:1. they now risk paying a hefty fine for setting a minimum payment for purchases with credit card. 2. Merchants may also have the option of rejecting a specific card, like a reward card.

  Such a defense may work. A report by the Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress, due out by Nov. 19, is weighing the potential impact of proposed rules on the card-carrying masses. If the GAO finds that only merchants benefit from lower interchange fees, card companies may win. Says Brian Gardner, a vice-president at research firm Keefe, Bruyette& Woods: "If the report comes out and says there is little evidence that [the benefits] would be passed on to consumers, then I think the oxygen gets sucked out of this thing."

  本文选自新东方口译名师邱政政的blog,blog链接地址:http://blog.hjenglish.com/qiuzhengzheng

  相关链接:
  下载;新东方2010秋中级口译模考试卷
  新东方2010秋中级口译模考试卷答案
  下载;新东方2010秋高级口译模考试卷
  新东方2010秋高级口译模考试卷答案

本文关键字:

更多>>
更多课程>>
更多>>
更多课程>>
更多>>
更多内容