2022年上海高级口译考前模拟练习8

2022年上海高级口译考前模拟练习8

　　上海高级口译相对来说难度更大，对于基础和中级口译来说，上海高级口译考察大家英语知识点会更广泛。这对于大家来说是备考的难点。那么在实际的备考中，这部分内容应该如何进行积累学习呢?下面小编为大家整理了“2022年上海高级口译考前模拟练习8”，让我们一起来看看吧!

　　A former Government chief scientist once told me that we should always have

　　a Plan B ready in case Plan A doesn’t work – or doesn’t happen. He was speaking

　　in relation to the possibility of “geo-engineering” the climate if it becomes

　　obvious that global warming is beginning to tip irrevocably towards a

　　potentially dangerous state.

　　He could only say this once he was out of office of course because the

　　official Government view at the time – as it is now – was that “there is no Plan

　　B” in relation to climate change, that the only conceivable way of avoiding

　　dangerous global temperature increases in the future is to curb the production

　　of greenhouse gas emissions now.

　　Geo-engineering is defined as the deliberate, large-scale in order to limit

　　undesirable climate change, but it is seen by many as a technical fix too far.

　　At its most outlandish, geo-engineering envisages putting giant mirrors in space

　　to deflect incoming solar radiation, but it also includes more benign

　　interventions, such as solar powered “artificial trees” in the desert for

　　soaking up carbon dioxide in the air.

　　Despite the official view of there being no Plan B, however, last week’s

　　fifth report by the has placed geo-engineering firmly on the agenda – even if

　　the scientific panel rather denigrates the idea as probably unworkable and

　　potentially dangerous. Nevertheless, for some critics of geo-engineering the

　　mere mention of the concept in such an official and high-profile publication is

　　enough to see red.

　　Indeed, the Canadian-based ETC Group of environmentalists, perceived a

　　Russian-led conspiracy to subvert the IPCC process. Russia had insisted on the

　　addition of geo-engineering to the report and it is Russia where many

　　geo-engineering projects are being tested, the ETC Group claims.

　　Before getting carried away with the inclusion for the first time of

　　geo-engineering in an IPCC report, it is worth pointing out that the panel

　　emphasises the inherent flaws of the proposals to counter rising temperatures.

　　Deflecting sunlight with artificially created white clouds over the oceans, for

　　instance, would do nothing to prevent the acidification of the oceans and, if it

　　had to be stopped for any reason, global surface temperatures would soon rise

　　again even higher than before.

　　In short, if we rely on a technical fix to , rather than addressing the

　　root problem, we could become addicted to the illusion that all is well when, in

　　fact, all that we are doing is delaying the inevitable, while increasing the

　　risk of some serious unintended consequences, which history tells us are never

　　far away from big engineering proposals of this kind.

　　Take for instance the relatively small-scale geo-engineering project to

　　divert the rivers running into the Aral Sea of the former Soviet Union. Half a

　　century ago the Aral Sea was the fourth largest lake in the world with a

　　thriving commercial fishery, but by 2007 it had declined to about 10 per cent of

　　its original size, with fishing boats stranded in the middle of a toxic salt

　　pan.

　　Soviet scientists diverted water from two rivers running into the Aral Sea

　　to irrigate fields of cotton and other crops. But in the end they created a

　　barren, dusty landscape where once there was a sea filled with wildlife. Toxins

　　and salt blown from the Aral’s parched basement even threatened the very crops

　　that the project was meant to generate.

　　So when some people talk about the possibility of “fixing” the climate with

　　technological interventions rather than cuts in carbon dioxide emissions, let’s

　　not forget history. Perhaps HM Government is right: there is no Plan B.

　　Talking of carbon dioxide, I have just returned from an interesting visit

　　to the Czech Republic where health tourism, rather than being frowned upon, is

　　positively encouraged.

　　What has this got to do with carbon dioxide, you may ask? Well one of the

　　more curious, if not bizarre “medical” treatments you can buy is a dip in a dry

　　bath of carbon dioxide. For 20 minutes or so you bathe everything below your

　　waist (fully clothed) in an atmosphere of “natural” carbon dioxide pumped from

　　underground sources.

　　It is said by those who sell it to cure a range of conditions and even acts

　　like a dose of Viagra. Strictly in the interests of science I volunteered. I

　　intend to publish my findings in a peer-reviewed scientific journal – that is if

　　I can find one prepared to overlook my limited set of data points.

　　本文后附上三个题目：

　　1、What is geo-engineering? What are the possible international measures of

　　geo-engineering?

　　2、What are the views of the critics of geo-engineering?

　　3、Why does the author introduce the small scale geo-engineering

　　project?

　　从题目中可以看出，本文的中心词是geo-engineering，文章对geo-engineering还提出了相当的质疑，并提出可以实验小型

　　geo-engineering。从文章第三段开始，可以找到geo-engineering的定义。接着正好是各国可以采用的手段和人们提出的质疑。文章后三段相熟了小型的geo-engineering。

　　以上就是为大家整理的“2022年上海高级口译考前模拟练习8”，希望大家能够更好的学习上海高级口译，取得理想的成绩。